1. Introduction
The recognition of the significance of hydropower has gained increasing importance on a global scale. This is due to its sustainability and the rapid depletion of traditional sources of electricity, such as fossil fuels and coal
| [1] | G. A. Ryabov, “Cofiring of Coal and Fossil Fuels is a Way to Decarbonization of Heat and Electricity Generation (Review),” Thermal Engineering, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 405–417, Jun. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522060052 |
| [2] | L. Cherwoo et al., “Biofuels an alternative to traditional fossil fuels: A comprehensive review,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 60, p. 103503, Dec. 2023,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103503 |
[1, 2]
. The expected increase in electricity demand by 2035 is stipulated at seventy per cent (70%), with half a billion people in Africa alone not having access to electricity
| [3] | Z. Li, S. Chen, and X. Chang, “Achieving clean energy via economic stability to qualify sustainable development goals in China,” Econ Anal Policy, vol. 81, pp. 1382–1394, Mar. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.003 |
[3]
. Estimating the global population of people to be at eight (8) billion by 2035, along with rapid economic and industrialised growth in developing countries, a shortage in electricity demand could occur if an alternative to the non-renewable sources of the world’s electricity is not sought
| [4] | S. Penin y Santos, E. F. de Carvalho, and C. A. de S. Penin, “The Big Challenge: Reducing Global Emissions and Increasing Global GDP,” Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 76–93, Apr. 2025,
https://doi.org/10.26855/jepes.2024.12.005 |
| [5] | O. Abramova, “The Population of Africa under the Conditions of Transformation of the World Order,” Her Russ Acad Sci, vol. 92, no. S14, pp. S1306–S1315, Dec. 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622200023 |
[4, 5]
. The over-dependence on the non-renewable resources (fossil fuel, nuclear, coal and gas) of the world’s electricity is proven unsatisfactory since a large section of the world's people still do not have access to this electricity. The rapid depletion of these non-renewable resources threatens the world’s electricity sustainability and, therefore, the need to turn to renewable resources, including hydropower. In Africa, wood from trees and shrubs is still the most important domestic fuel. The use of petroleum and coal is limited to urban areas, factories and power plants. The continent’s most promising source of power is hydroelectric power due to its vast number of rivers that have not been exploited. In the 1960s, several major installations were constructed; these include the Kpong and Akosomba dams in Ghana. The Akosombo dam (established in 1965) could generate 5.4 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity. Ghana, until the mid-1990s, was a regular exporter of electricity, but low water levels in the Volta Lake have periodically caused power shortages in the country. The world’s population is estimated to reach 8.8 billion people by 2040, and with fossil fuel as its main electricity source, it will be impossible for this non-renewable resource to sustain this overwhelming population. The other factors that call for another source of electricity include: depletion of this non-renewable source, increasing greenhouse effect and increasing oil demand
| [6] | B. Mufutau Opeyemi, “Path to sustainable energy consumption: The possibility of substituting renewable energy for non-renewable energy,” Energy, vol. 228, p. 120519, Aug. 2021,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120519 |
| [7] | L. C. Voumik, Md. A. Islam, S. Ray, N. Y. Mohamed Yusop, and A. R. Ridzuan, “CO2 Emissions from Renewable and Non-Renewable Electricity Generation Sources in the G7 Countries: Static and Dynamic Panel Assessment,” Energies (Basel), vol. 16, no. 3, p. 1044, Jan. 2023,
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031044 |
[6, 7]
.
Thus, renewable energy alternatives or green sources, which are sustainable, should be more desirable than non-renewable energy sources. Currently, the common forms of renewable energy systems are: solar energy, wind energy, hydro energy, tidal energy, geothermal energy, and biomass energy
| [8] | A. Kumar and D. B. Pal, “Renewable Energy Development Sources and Technology: Overview,” Springer, Singapore, 2025, pp. 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9626-7_1 |
| [9] | A. A. K. Alhijazi, R. A. Almasri, and A. F. Alloush, “A Hybrid Renewable Energy (Solar/Wind/Biomass) and Multi-Use System Principles, Types, and Applications: A Review,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 24, p. 16803, Dec. 2023,
https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416803 |
| [10] | N. K. K. A. and V. A., “Renewable Energy Resources and Their Types,” IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2023, pp. 116–135.
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8816-4.ch008 |
[8-10]
. Accordingly, Abbasi et al (2022)
| [11] | K. R. Abbasi, M. Shahbaz, J. Zhang, M. Irfan, and R. Alvarado, “Analyze the environmental sustainability factors of China: The role of fossil fuel energy and renewable energy,” Renew Energy, vol. 187, pp. 390–402, Mar. 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.066 |
[11]
posit that the sustainable energy needs of the world will become very relevant in the next fifty (50) years, due to the pronounced effects of fossil fuel usage on the environment. Hence, the complications surrounding the integration of renewable energy acquisition need to be looked at intensively. The reliability of the supply while using intermittent sources of electricity, and the ensuing need for storage and backup generation, are necessary factors in high percentage renewable energy systems
| [12] | S. O. Sanni, J. Y. Oricha, T. O. Oyewole, and F. I. Bawonda, “Analysis of backup power supply for unreliable grid using hybrid solar PV/diesel/biogas system,” Energy, vol. 227, p. 120506, Jul. 2021,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120506 |
| [13] | M. Muzammal Islam et al., “Improving Reliability and Stability of the Power Systems: A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Energy Storage Systems to Enhance Flexibility,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 152738–152765, 2024,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3476959 |
[12, 13]
. A higher level of both small-scale and large-scale deployment of innovative and renewable energy supply technologies will be feasible as these technologies get more affordable and appealing.
Among the renewable energy resources, hydropower is one of the most commercially developed renewable energy sources. It involves building a dam to serve as a huge reservoir, which is used to create a controlled flow of water that can rotate a turbine to produce electricity. Compared to solar or wind energy, this type of energy is more reliable and efficient, and it also allows electricity to be stored for use when demand is at its peak
| [14] | U. S. Bhatt, B. A. Carreras, J. M. R. Barredo, D. E. Newman, P. Collet, and D. Gomila, “The Potential Impact of Climate Change on the Efficiency and Reliability of Solar, Hydro, and Wind Energy Sources,” Land (Basel), vol. 11, no. 8, p. 1275, Aug. 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081275 |
[14]
, though the operation of hydropower plants can alter river flows, potentially affecting river ecosystems. According to National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2025)
| [15] | National Renewable Energy Laboratory, “NREL Is Strengthening the Future of Hydropower, A Cornerstone of America’s Energy System,” 2025. Accessed: Dec. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: www.nrel.gov |
[15]
of the US Department of Energy, now renamed National Laboratory of the Rockies, the world’s hydroelectric power plants have a combined capacity of six hundred and seventy-five thousand megawatt (675000 Megawatt (MW)), which produces 2.3 trillion of electricity each year; supplying twenty-four per cent (24%) of the world’s electricity to more than one billion customers. This indicates that hydropower is the world's leading renewable electricity source, providing over 14% of global power, with significant capacity growth driven by Asia and Africa, especially in pumped storage for grid flexibility
| [16] | A. Wasti, P. Ray, S. Wi, C. Folch, M. Ubierna, and P. Karki, “Climate change and the hydropower sector: A global review,” Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change, vol. 13, no. 2, p. e757, Mar. 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1002/WCC.757;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:17577799;WEBSITE:WEBSITE:WIRES;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION |
[16]
. In 2024, generation rebounded strongly (around 4,500+ Terawatt-hour (TWh)) after drought impacts, with total installed capacity nearing 1,400 Gigawatt (GW)
| [17] | H. E. Fälth, F. Hedenus, L. Reichenberg, and N. Mattsson, “Through energy droughts: Hydropower’s ability to sustain a high output,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 214, p. 115519, May 2025,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115519. |
[17]
. While its share of overall growth may slightly shrink due to solar/wind, hydropower remains crucial for grid stability and low-carbon systems, with ongoing development and modernisation efforts in developing countries.
There are three main categories of small hydropower plants: mini (500 kW to 10 MW), micro (10 kW to 500 kW), and pico (less than 10 kW)
| [18] | A. Moulaye Abdou and A. Ahmed Abdou, “Multi Use Water System Approach for Small Hydro Power Plants (SHPP) alongside Irrigation and Drinking Water Supply (DWS) Networks,” in Advances in Hydropower Technologies, IntechOpen, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1007635 |
| [19] | S. J. W. Klein and E. L. B. Fox, “A review of small hydropower performance and cost,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 169, p. 112898, Nov. 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112898 |
[18, 19]
. Small hydropower cannot be disregarded as a solution to meet some of Africa’s future energy demands because of its ability to serve the energy needs of the dispersed rural population. Small hydropower development often has lower costs than large-scale hydropower production
| [20] | U. Azimov and N. Avezova, “Sustainable small-scale hydropower solutions in Central Asian countries for local and cross-border energy/water supply,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 167, p. 112726, Oct. 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112726 |
[20]
. Several studies on small and mini hydropower sites have been carried out in Ghana. A total small hydropower plant (SHP) potential of Ghana has been estimated to be between 1.2 MW installed capacity for the minimum case and 4 MW installed capacity for the maximum scenario when considering straightforward run-of-river projects, sized to provide electricity for rural communities not connected to the national grid
| [21] | W. M. Tefera and K. S. Kasiviswanathan, “A global-scale hydropower potential assessment and feasibility evaluations,” Water Resour Econ, vol. 38, p. 100198, Apr. 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2022.100198 |
| [22] | A. Adu-Poku et al., “Impact of drought on hydropower generation in the Volta River basin and future projections under different climate and development pathways,” Energy and Climate Change, vol. 5, p. 100169, Dec. 2024,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100169 |
| [23] | B. E. Yankey et al., “Small hydropower development potential in the Densu River Basin, Ghana,” J Hydrol Reg Stud, vol. 45, p. 101304, Feb. 2023,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101304 |
[21-23]
. However, if the SHP could be connected to the national electrical grid, which would absorb the extra energy output, this installed capacity might be greatly improved. In Ghana, there are three hydropower facilities located in Akosombo, Kpong and Bui on the Volta River. The Akosombo plant is upstream and discharges a head downstream to feed the Kpong facility. The Akosombo plant is constructed to function between water levels 75.59 m in the minimum and 84.12 m in the maximum, while the Kpong plant functions between water levels 14.5 m in the minimum scenario and 17.7 m in the maximum
. The Akosombo and Kpong dams were established in 1965 and 1982, respectively, with a capacity of 1072 MW and 160 MW, respectively. The Akosombo features six turbine-generators that are normally running between a water head level of 84.12 m and 75.59 m, whereas the Kpong plant comprises four turbine-generator units and operates with a water head elevation of 17.70 m maximum and 14.50 m minimum. The Bui Hydroelectric Power Station is Ghana's third major hydro project, located on the Black Volta River, providing significant clean energy (around 404 MW) to the national grid, bolstering energy security, especially in northern Ghana, and integrating modern tech like solar and battery storage for a hybrid renewable system, making it a key part of Ghana's sustainable energy future.
This study explores the hydroelectric power generation potential of the Pwalugu River section of the White Volta River Basin, using the shallow water equations (SWEs) hydrodynamic model. The White Volta River Basin is a major sub-basin of the Volta River system in West Africa, stretching across Burkina Faso and Ghana, characterised by semi-arid to subhumid zones, crucial for millions of livelihoods, but facing challenges such as flooding due to rainfall and dam releases from the Bagre dam in Burkina Faso, water scarcity, and climate change impacts. Each year, the spillage of the Bagre dam causes flooding in low-lying communities along the White Volta and the Black Volta in Ghana, destroying livelihoods and rendering many residents homeless. The government of Ghana has been exploring options, including constructing dams along the stretch to store excess water for irrigation and boost food production. This study contributes to the options available to utilise the spillage of the Bagre dam to avert flooding in Ghana and reduce possible tension between Ghana and Burkina Faso.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Formulation of Hydrodynamic Model
The mathematical model employed for the potential hydroelectric power generation from the White Volta River is based on the shallow water equations. The Shallow Water Equations (SWEs) are a set of simplified partial differential equations (PDEs) describing fluid flow where the horizontal scale is much larger than the vertical depth, used for oceans, rivers, and atmospheres, modelling tides, tsunamis, and storm surges by conserving mass and momentum, representing fluid height (h) and average velocity (u)
| [25] | Y. Song, C. Shen, and X. Liu, “A Surrogate Model for Shallow Water Equations Solvers with Deep Learning,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 149, no. 11, p. 04023045, Nov. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-13190;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION |
| [26] | S. A. Rajput, S. A. Kamboh, K. B. Amur, and A. A. Bhutto, “Improved explicit finite difference method for extended shallow water partial differential equation,” Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics, vol. 16, p. 101316, Dec. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2025.101316 |
[25, 26]
. They arise from depth-averaging the Navier-Stokes equations, assuming hydrostatic balance (i.e., negligible vertical acceleration) and constant density, which leads to hyperbolic equations that capture wave propagation and nonlinear effects
| [27] | A. I. Sukhinov, E. A. Protsenko, and S. V. Protsenko, “Comparative Analysis of Numerical and Analytical Studies of Hydrodynamic Processes in Shallow Water Bodies,” Water Resources, vol. 51, no. S2, pp. S216–S230, Dec. 2024,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807824701525 |
[27]
. Accordingly, the development of large-scale whirlpools (vortices) in water bodies, such as rivers, is due to interactions between the water and submerged objects
| [28] | S. Hwang, B. Na, and S. Son, “Understanding Tidal Jet Vortices Over Complex Bathymetry via Numerical Modeling and Drone Observation: Match and Mismatch in the Vortex Dynamics Under Idealized and Realistic Topographic Settings,” J Geophys Res Oceans, vol. 129, no. 12, p. e2024JC021523, Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021523;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION |
[28]
. In achieving total volume and total momentum conservation of fluid in the flow directions, conservation equations need to be attained for water flux and momentum. The diagrammatic representation of a river channel with irregular bed structure is shown in
Figure 1.
Figure 1. A Shallow Water Channel with Irregular Bed Topography.
In
Figure 1,
is fluid velocity in the flow direction,
is the water depth,
is the channel bottom topography elevation,
is the channel depth along the z-direction. To capture the effect of disturbance caused by submerged structures in fluid flows, and their contribution to hydropower generation, the study modelled the depth-averaged shallow water equations (SWE). According to , the SWEs for fluid flow in a channel with depth
, averaged horizontal and vertical velocities
and
, respectively, are given as:
(2)
(3)
Where the bed elevation is . The and are depth-averaged Coriolis force components, and is the acceleration due to gravity. The mathematical expressions, for , and , the depth-averaged components of the viscous stresses. The Reynolds stress tensors are:
(6)
The wind stresses and bottom friction in the flow directions are respectively denoted by ()s, ()s and ()b, ()b (Ercan & Kavvas, 2015):
The bed friction in the flow direction is of the Manning form:
The parameters of the above equations are designated as:
being the bed slope coefficient,
n being the Manning roughness coefficient,
the eddy viscosity,
the water height,
the kinematic viscosity and
the fluid density. The flow velocities in the x-y directions are represented by
and
. When fluid interacts with bottom topographic structures, disturbances are introduced in the fluid around the vicinity of the topographic structure and render equations (
2) and (
3) inappropriate in predicting fluid behaviour. Therefore, equations (
1) - (
3) are modified as follows:
(13)
(14)
Where: is the rotation of fluid volume, is the height of the water in the channel, , are the velocities in the x-y directions of the flow. The shear stress terms are defined as:
=and=(15)
The bottom shear stresses in the flow directions are designated as:
and(16)
And lastly, the surface stresses;
The preceding equations (
1) - (
3) can be cast into a form appropriate for application of the numerical scheme. Thus,
(18)
To solve equations (
1) - (
3), a finite volume discretisation scheme is employed within the Lax-Wendroff algorithm. The numerical solutions obtained will be analysed in the following sections.
The model of the bottom topography , inspected in this study, is the double mount placed at the channel entrance, channel middle and end of a 1km long channel. The double bottom mount is modelled as:
(19)
Where x01, y01, and x02, y02 are the respective locations of the two bottom mounts.
The following initial conditions are applied:
For the d pth,
(20)
for the momentum components,
(21)
For the Dirichlet boundary condition on , a periodic boundary condition on and a no-slip boundary condition on at the inlet boundary. Thus;
(23)
For the kinetic boundary condition on , periodic boundary condition on and a no-slip boundary condition on at the outlet boundary. Thus;
(26)
(27)
2.2. Initial and Boundary Conditions
The stimulated domain, indicating the boundaries, is displayed in
Figure 2. The computational domain of the channel consists of horizontal walls or river banks, an inlet upstream and an outlet downstream.
Figure 2. Computational Domain of River Channel.
2.2.1. Initial Conditions
The initial conditions for the shallow water equations are:
For the depth,
(29)
And for the momentum components,
2.2.2. Boundary Conditions: Inlet and Outlet
Fluid constantly flows in and out of the domain. For this reason, one can impose a Dirichlet boundary condition on , periodic boundary condition on and a no-slip boundary condition on at the inlet boundary.
Thus;
Where, Lx is the channel length in meters. For the channel outlet, a kinetic boundary condition is imposed on , periodic boundary condition on h and no-slip boundary condition on at the outlet boundary. They are:
Where Ly is the channel width in meters.
2.2.3. Boundary Conditions: River Walls
At the walls (river banks), kinetic boundary conditions are imposed on and and no-slip boundary condition imposed on . That is, at y = 0, y = Ly, , v = 0. Thus;
The discretised form of the solid walls’ boundary conditions is:
2.3. Topographic Models of the River Bed
Bottom topography has significant implications in determining flow fields in oceans and rivers, and is also applied in shallow water waves to assess tsunami waves that originate from underwater earthquakes, which can cause irregular topography and alter water depth
| [31] | L. Borzì et al., “Tsunami propagation and flooding maps: An application for the Island of Lampedusa, Sicily Channel, Italy,” Earth Surf Process Landf, vol. 49, no. 14, pp. 4842–4861, Nov. 2024,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ESP.5996;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:10969837;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION |
| [32] | C.-H. Lee, P. H.-Y. Lo, H. Shi, and Z. Huang, “Numerical Modeling of Generation of Landslide Tsunamis: A Review,” Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, vol. 16, no. 06, Dec. 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431122410019 |
| [33] | M. Y. Regina and E. S. Mohamed, “Modeling study of tsunami wave propagation,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 10491–10506, Sep. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04484-2 |
[31-33]
. A river that has a flat bottom and a river that has single and double mountains placed along flow paths are modelled, and their corresponding effects on flow patterns are presented in the next section. The combined nature of the seabed and water surface constitutes the topography of a channel. The variation of river bottom topography has a significant influence on fluid flow patterns and therefore requires a deeper understanding to ensure proper flow behaviour analysis. The preceding section presents various river bottom topographies and how they vary the flow pattern. In all the models, the water surface was assumed to be rippled. A simple sinusoidal function can describe such a ripple surface:
2.3.1. Flat Bottom Model
The model for a river channel with a flat bottom can be modelled as:
A typical graphical view of flat bottom topography for
, and the water surface is shown in
Figure 3.
Figure 3. 3D flow pattern along a flat-bottom channel due to waves.
2.3.2. Single Mountain Along Flow Path
The bottom topography of a river with a single mountain can be modelled using the Gaussian expression:
(43)
Where are the coordinates of the location of the obstacle centre.
A graphical view of the single mountain model is shown in
Figure 4. The mountain was placed at three different locations: left, middle and right of the channel.
Figure 4. Locations of the bottom mountain at (a) channel entrance, (b) channel middle, (c) channel extreme.
2.3.3. Two Mountains Along the Flow Path
The bottom topography of a river with two mountains arranged along the flow path is modelled by the equation:
(44)
Where x
01, y
01, and x
02, y
02 are the respective locations of the two bottom mounts. The graphical view of two mountains at three different locations in the river channel is displayed in
Figure 5: the entrance, middle and end of the channel.
Figure 5. Location of the double bottom mountains model at (a) channel entrance, (b) channel middle, (c) channel end.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Model Validation
To proceed with analysing the results obtained in this study, it was essential to verify the accuracy of the results. Thus, a validation of the results was conducted by applying the flat-bottom model case to the analytical solution derived from Equations (
2) and (
3), under simplified assumptions.
That is, considering only steady and horizontal flows in the flat channel, the equation becomes:
The analytical solution is straightforward upon integrating across the river channel, as:
Where
depends on the pressure gradient,
p and viscosity,
. The graph of the solution of equation (
45), which is in agreement with the stimulated flat case model, is displayed in
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Comparison of the flow profile in an ideal channel with the model.
3.2. Hydrodynamic Response and Flow Curves
It was imperative to study the dynamic behaviour of the water elevation, h and the flow rate, Q or the velocity of the flow, u. This served as a precursor for the identification of potential locations where maximum power can be obtained. Thus, the hydropower generation potential of the Pwalugu River section of White Volta was modelled.
3.2.1. Hydrokinetic Power and Energy Analysis
The power that can be assessed from a flowing stream is calculated theoretically as:
Where
is acceleration due to gravity,
is discharge and
is the water surface elevation. Depending on the type of hydropower generating system, the elevation,
is defined differently. In the run-of-river, as is the study case, the elevation is defined as:
. The fluctuation is caused by the bottom topography. In analogy with the total energy stored in the system. The power in equation (
43) can be cast into components:
.
Where is the power due to the elevation, and is associated with the power stored in the dynamic system. They are defined as:
And using , the dynamic power resulting from the disturbance is
(49)
Thus, the power-generating capacity of the river channel can be obtained from:
The energy associated with power in equation (
48) can be obtained using the expression:
Where
is the time scale associated with the operation period. Therefore, equations (
49) and (
50) were used to assess the potential of the study area.
3.2.2. Average Power and Energy Potential
In
Figure 7, the mean power is plotted against distance along the river. It is expected that (from
Figure 7a - c) the locations of maximum power fluctuations happen to be at the various locations close to the bottom mountains, where there is a high level of perturbation due to fluid-bottom mountain interactions. A maximum power of about 1.8 MW was observed at locations x = 240 m, x = 481 m and x = 962 m, which happen to be in the neighbourhood of the engineered bottom structures. These corresponding power fluctuations at locations of the bottom mountains, as portrayed by
Figure 8(a-c), confirm the linearity that exists between energy and power. Hence, installing a turbine at such locations would result in considerable hydropower generation.
Figure 7. Graph of mean power along the river channel due to the bottom mountain at: (a) channel entrance, (b) channel middle, and (c) channel extreme.
Furthermore, in
Figure 8 (a-c), the mean energy is plotted against distance along the river channel. The highest mean energy was observed for 2 bottom mounts in the three locations of the engineered structures: channel entrance, middle and extreme. The highest mean energy realised was about 75 Kilowatt-hour (kWh). A second-highest mean energy of about 60 kWh was released at the locations of the single mounts. The corresponding increase in the energy in the flowing water at the locations of the bottom mountains is an indication of the inculcation of energy-bearing structures in the flowing water due to the interaction between the bottom mountains and the flowing water in the channel.
Figure 8. Graph of mean energy along the river channel due to the bottom mountain at (a) channel entrance, (b) channel middle, (c) channel extreme.
3.2.3. Peak Power and Maximum Energy Potential
Figure 9. Graph of maximum energy along the river channel due to the bottom mountain at (a) channel entrance, (b) channel middle, (c) channel extreme.
A comparative analysis was conducted on peak power and maximum energy production by various topographies, together with an evaluation of the model performance to ascertain the particular topographic model for optimum power generation.
Figures 9 (a-c) and 10 (a-c) display the graphs of maximum energy and peak power at the locations of three topographies along the river channel.
In
Figure 9 above, it was evident that the maximum energy in the cases of left, middle and right positioning of engineered structures, the 2 mounts were observed with maximum energy of about 185 kWh for left-oriented 2 mounts, middle-oriented 2 mounts and right-oriented 2 mounts. The second-highest maximum energy of about 140 kWh was produced at the locations of 1 mount. These arrangements, therefore, yielded the highest energy.
Figure 10. Graph of maximum power along the river channel due to the bottom mountain at (a) channel entrance, (b) channel middle, (c) channel extreme.
In
Figure 10 above, it is evident that the maximum power in the cases of left, middle, and right positioning of engineered structures was observed with the 2 mounts, with a maximum power of about 2.9 MW for the left-oriented 2 mounts, middle-oriented 2 mounts, and right-oriented 2 mounts. The second-highest maximum power of approximately 2.2 MW was produced at the location of Mount 1. Thus, these arrangements yielded the highest power.